Full adversarial-review record, MathLab War Room v5.22.6
Context — read first. This is raw output from an adversarial-by-design audit pipeline. The Critic role is instructed to attack maximally; “FATAL”/“CRITICAL” labels in the round transcripts are hypotheses, not verdicts. Verdicts are issued only by the Verifier and Synthesizer after checking, and are then hand-verified. The disposition record below is the adjudicated outcome of every finding across all passes.
Pass 1 (self-audit, rounds 26–30): all quantitative claims confirmed; findings were definitional-precision only. Pass 2 (verify pass, rounds 1–5): all Pass 1 fixes confirmed; scores rose (units 78→82, CF1 72→88). Lock review (third model family): all nine targets verified or acknowledged-scope-by-design — “no load-bearing fix needed before Zenodo.” Across the entire process: two theorem-statement-level edits, both hypothesis-narrowing; zero refuted mathematical claims in any pass.
These are unedited pipeline transcripts, served as-is for transparency of the research trail. See the MathLab case study for how to read adversarial output, and the research policy for our correspondence process.